← Back to Food Mixer Reviews

Kenwood HM220 Review

We weren’t impressed with the Kenwood HM320 model hand mixer that we recently looked at. However, there is a chance for redemption today as we’re taking a look at the cheaper Kenwood HM220 hand mixer. Will it be another one to avoid? There’s only one way to find out!

The HM220 is one of the cheapest hand mixers around. It can be bought online for under £15. So what do you get for that price?

The motor which provides the elbow grease in this model is 120 watts, with 3 speeds. This is definitely on the wimpy side, so we’ll be interested to see if it can come up with the goods when it comes to tougher jobs.

There are no bells and whistles here – this mixer is meant for mixing and mixing alone. As such, all you’ll get in the box apart from the handset, are a pair of stainless steel beaters.

That’s it! There’s no dough hooks, no eject button for the beaters. Simply the handset and the beaters. For the price though we can’t really expect much more – let’s just hope that it does its job well!

The outside of the machine is as basic as the features; it’s got a simple white design and wipeable plastic finish. Nothing fancy here either.

We found that most food mixers were cheapest at Amazon.co.uk, including the Kenwood HM220 which is currently available for 29% off.

Kenwood HM220 Hand Mixer Features and Specifications

  • 120 watt motor with 3 speeds
  • Stainless steel beaters included
  • Clean white plastic finish – easy to wipe clean

Customer Feedback and Reviews

Looking at real world stories of how well a mixer performs is key, and this is the area in which we discovered the short comings of the more expensive HM320 model. Again, we’ve found a lot of disgruntled customers this time around. Whilst 75% of people recommended the HM220 mixer, this means that there’s a 1 in 4 chance that you’re going to be unhappy if you buy it.

To give this device its dues, it does do its job well. People said that it mixes well, and is very easy to use. It’s simple and does exactly what it should, so no complaints there.

So why were so many people unhappy?

As with their more expensive hand mixer, it seems that Kenwood have been cutting corners here. The problem with this one again stems from their use of flimsy plastic.

This time, countless customers complained that a flimsy piece of plastic holds the beaters together. Many people experienced this breaking very quickly, rendering the mixer completely useless.

We realise this is a cheap device, but it’s such a waste of money and raw materials to sell a product that simply can’t stand the test of time. Even after relatively light use (10 uses or less) customers were experiencing this problem.

Stay away from the Kenwood HM220. Sure, it might hold up for a while and it does its job just fine while it does. But it seems that it will eventually simply break down, mainly due to the shoddy use of flimsy plastic. Since you’d have to buy another mixer again eventually anyway, we’d suggest spending a little bit more right now, for something that’s going to last. The Andrew James model hand mixer is a much better bet.

  • Score: 1 stars

← Back to Food Mixer Reviews

Author: